Sunday, June 17, 2012

Latest from: CleanTechnica

Latest from: CleanTechnica

Link to CleanTechnica

The Next War Could Be Fought with Fireflies

Posted: 17 Jun 2012 10:29 AM PDT

DOD and Air Force support biomimicry lighting based on firefliesThe Department of Defense is a major funder behind a new biomimicry based approach to lighting, which harnesses the power of fireflies to create an energy efficient glow. How important could bug-powered light become? Well, as one indicator the grant came through the U.S. government’s most prestigious channel for supporting the work of up-and-coming innovators, the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers.

Creating Light from Fireflies

Fireflies create light through a biochemical reaction that involves a light-emitting compound called luciferin and an enzyme called luciferase.

Luciferin was first isolated in the laboratory more than 60 years ago, but until now researchers have been stuck on finding a way to deploy it efficiently.

One key stumbling block has been finding a way to attach the biological material to a non-biological surface without losing a lot of energy in the process.

The research team, based at the Syracuse University College of Arts and Sciences, developed a semiconductor made up of cadmium seleneide nanorods surrounded by cadmium sulfide — basically, the materials commonly used in electronic goods including computers, solar cells and LEDs (light emitting diodes).

Genetically engineered luciferase (provided by a collaborating team at Connecticut College) is then chemically attached to the surface of the nanorods. When luciferin is added, the coated nanorods emit a glow.

Going fireflies one better

By altering the size of the cadmium seleneide core and the length of the rod, the team was able to produce colors that are impossible for fireflies: green, orange and red.

With this latest development, the team has achieved an efficiency on the order of 20 to 30 times better than previous attempts, but there is still a long way to go before the technology is ready for real world application. The next steps involve finding ways to keep the reaction (and the light) going for a longer time, and to scale it up to a workable size.

This is by no means the Department of Defense’s first funding for  biomimicry research. Just a few recent examples include the notorious “mosquito drone” under development at Johns Hopkins University, a robotic jellyfish that can harvest energy from seawater, and a new solar cell modeled on the texture of a leaf.

Note: The PECASE award for Syracuse was sponsored by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, which also supported the Connecticut College research (PECASE is administered by the National Science Foundation).

Image: Some rights reserved by takot.

Follow me on Twitter: @TinaMCasey.


German Solar Industry Getting Hammered by Cheap Chinese Imports

Posted: 16 Jun 2012 11:43 PM PDT

Cheap imports of silicon solar photovoltaic (PV) panels from China, sharp cuts in subsidies, and the ongoing euro zone debt crisis is taking a heavy toll on Germany’s once world-beating solar energy industry.

“The golden era of the German solar energy sector is over,” according to a June 16 Deutsche Welle (DW) article. “At its peak, Germany had a 20-percent share of the global solar energy market, but now the figure stands at just 6 percent. After a rapid decline in recent months, more job cuts are expected to hit the industry.

Oh, the Bitter Irony… of Solar FiTs… Combined with State-Run Economies

Solar PV supply has grown faster even than fast-growing demand. Chinese silicon solar PV manufacturers have been exporting some 95% of the silicon solar panels they produce. They’ve now captured more than 50% of the global market for silicon solar cells and panels.

Ironically, Germany and other European governments’ pioneering solar energy Feed-in Tariffs (FiTs) created the demand and market growth that led the Chinese government to launch a massive solar PV manufacturing subsidy program geared specifically at ramping up exports.

While that’s been the primary driver in bringing about a dramatic drop in the price of solar panels worldwide, it’s also come with substantial downside for domestic manufacturers, essentially putting the foundation of the entire industry value and supply chain in Chinese hands.

German and other European Union countries with FiTs — which stimulate demand regardless of product origin — have made the EU the primary destination for Chinese exports. Their low cost and easy availability have led German and other EU solar PV project developers and installers to buy them as opposed to solar panels made in Germany or other countries. Essentially, a significant portion of EU solar subsidies have been flowing through to Chinese silicon solar PV manufacturers.

Realizing the Ramifications; Better Late than Never?

The cutthroat price competition brought about in large part by China’s manufacturing subsidies has led German and solar PV manufacturers in other countries, including the US, to skimp on R&D, particularly when it comes to investing in improving manufacturing processes.

“We realized on numerous occasions that, in comparison to traditional, long-established industries like automotive engineering, a lot less was being invested,” Hummel told DW. “Many companies preferred to import good-quality solar panels from Asia than to carry out research,” DW relates. “And when innovation did occur, little attention was given to developing a mass-production process.”

Driven by government’s industrial policy, the Chinese juggernaut isn’t expected to slow down much, either. In fact, it’s growing. China’s latest Five-Year Plan includes as much as $1.5 trillion in subsidies, along with production and cost reduction targets, for seven strategic emerging industry sectors. Among them is thin-film solar PV, which doesn’t bode well for thin-film manufacturers outside China.

Chinese manufacturers’ rapid rise to market dominance has benefited other solar PV industry segments besides project developers and installers, but the returns have been diminishing. Manufacturers of silicon solar ingots, wafers and cells, and solar PV production equipment — a market in which German manufacturers have figured prominently — have benefited from surging Chinese demand.

“German machinery and facility builders were able to export up to 90 percent of their products to Asia,” German Center for Solar Market Research’s Wolfgang Hummel told DW. “There, complete factories for the production of solar modules and solar cells were constructed with German and Swiss assistance.”

The Chinese have been going to school on imports of European and US imports in order to build up their own capabilities. They’ve progressed to the point where Chinese producers of raw, solar-grade silicon, as well as silicon solar wafers and PV cells, have quickly gained market share and are now among the world’s leading producers.

Chinese Imports, FiT Subsidy Cuts, Rising Trade Tensions

Ironically, the flood of cheap Chinese imports, along with the persisting hangover of bad debts accumulated by banks and government during the credit boom that lasted for most of the first decade of the 21st century, has led to significant cuts in German and EU solar FiT subsidy rates.

“The funding rates have been halved in the last three years,” Carsten K├Ârnig, who leads the German Solar Industry Association told DW. “No other technological sector has had to reduce its costs as much to keep up as the solar power sector.”

The pressure on German solar PV industry players has only been increasing, evident in a growing list of insolvency filings. That’s led to increasingly strident assertions that Chinese solar PV companies are dumping product in Germany and other EU markets. SolarWorld AG’s US subsidy has successfully led the Coalition for American Solar Manufacturing’s (CASM) WTO dumping and unfair subsidies cases in the US, where the Commerce Dept. and ITC have issued preliminary penalties on imports of Chinese silicon solar PV cells and panels.

“The Chinese offer their customers a price that’s below cost,” DW quoted SolarWorld AG manager Frank Asbeck as saying. “By doing this, the Chinese government forces the good, technologically advanced companies into a dire financial straights [sic.] so they can ultimately monopolize the market.”

The likelihood of German solar PV companies filing similar petitions is growing. That would escalate trade tensions and the possibility of retaliatory actions at a time when the global economic recovery remains fragile.

Avoiding a Trade War That’s Been Going On for a Decade

Seeking to avoid an all-out trade war, the Coalition for Affordable Solar Energy (CASE), the Global Solar Council (a recently formed industry group of silicon and solar PV production equipment manufacturers), and the US Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA) have been urging the Commerce Dept., the International Trade Commission (ITC), and the Obama Administration to take a more diplomatic, conciliatory approach to resolving the issue.

Perhaps they haven’t noticed — or cared to notice — but the trade war they seek to avoid has been going on for about a decade now, and China’s stolen a march on everyone else. A level international playing field with enforceable rules needs to be established quickly if any form of open, competitive “free market” for solar PV cells and panels is to survive. Clearly, China’s not going to alter course without external pressure.

One hugely and mutually beneficial step the Chinese government could take is to redirect its supply-side manufacturing and export subsidies by reallocating them to more aggressively stimulate demand for solar solar energy installations inside China, particularly at the residential and commercial levels.

This would soak up excess supply, while at the same time boosting GDP and green job creation, not to mention the the tremendous benefit it would yield in terms of reducing CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions and the increasingly costly effects of a warming climate. It wouldn’t generate the international trade surpluses and foreign exchange reserves that China’s primarily relied on in becoming the world’s second-largest economy, however.


No comments:

Post a Comment