- Why German Solar Is So Much Cheaper Than U.S. Solar — Updated Study
- Psst, Hey, New York Times, The Real Issue with EVs Is Not the Miles, It’s the Money
- Small-Scale Wind Energy Systems (VIDEOS)
Posted: 17 Feb 2013 01:36 PM PST
The whole “Why is German solar about half the price of U.S. solar?” question is one of the most important solar questions of the day. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) has probably most extensively studied this matter. In a recently updated version of its analysis, LBNL examines why a residential German solar system goes for $3.00/watt and a residential U.S. solar system goes for $6.19/watt.
As no surprise to anyone who follows this matter, LBNL still concludes that the massive price differences above are basically due to soft costs. But the updated study also digs into the reasons why the soft costs are (or might be) so much lower. As LBNL rightly noted, relatively little has been known about how or why various soft cost differ.
First of all, let’s quickly run down how LBNL conducted this study:
Also, before getting into the results, here’s a quick reminder of the differences between German and U.S. solar power growth:
Alongside the differences in solar growth in the past several years, German solar has also been considerably cheaper for awhile now:
The specific question LBNL is trying to delve into is whether the lower solar power system costs in Germany are primarily due to its more mature market, or to what extent BoS costs are due to “larger overall market scale and associated learning-induced cost reductions.”
1. LBNL notes that about half the price difference described above may be due to market size in each of the countries.
One thing LBNL notes is that “non-module costs in 2011 were ~$2.8/W higher in the U.S. than in Germany” and that “at the same cumulative capacity that the U.S. had installed at the end of 2011 (4 GW), non-module costs for residential PV in Germany were only $1.3/W less than in the U.S.” A basic inference from that might be that only about half the difference in soft cost prices could be related to market size. However, it should also be noted that Germany is much smaller and has a much smaller but more densely concentrated population. So, 4 GW in Germany represents a much greater solar market saturation per capita or relative to many other relevant socioeconomic metrics.
2. Solar incentives may also be highly important (something Jigar Shah premised in a guest post on CleanTechnica in October). From LBNL:
3. A whole bunch of other possibilities.
As stated at the top, not much research has been conducted in this arena. There are a large number of reasons why the difference in prices occur. Of course, they aren’t mutually exclusive — it’s like a combination of many or all of these. Here are some hypothetical reasons noted by LBNL:
Specific Results of LBNL Study
When it comes to labor rates, there’s a lot of variation between the countries, with some jobs paying less in the U.S. and some paying less in Germany.
Customer acquisition costs are considerably lower in Germany (about 62¢/watt lower):
Some considerations why that might be, from LBNL, are:
Many have speculated that permitting costs are the main culprit of the prices differences, but that only comes to about 20¢/watt of the difference (not negligible, but not as much as customer acquisition).
Labor costs represent another considerable difference in price, which is largely due to how long it takes to install the solar systems in each country, but is also due to greater use of cheaper labor in Germany.
Through a couple of available mechanisms, basically all residential solar systems are exempt from revenue taxes, sales taxes, or value added taxes.
Not the case in the U.S. “23 states assess sales tax on residential PV systems, usually 4-8% of system prices, as do many local governments.”
The final conclusion from LBNL: “Given the spatial distribution of PV systems, and accounting for sales tax exemptions in some states, state and local sales taxes added $0.21/W to the median price of US residential PV in 2011.”
Other Soft Costs
Beyond the soft costs LBNL closely examined, a number of other soft costs apparently accounted for another $1.32/watt. These could include overhead, profit (seems to be unlikely), or other costs.
LBNL notes: “‘Overhead, proﬁt, and other residual sow costs’ is calculated as the diﬀerence between total sow costs and the sum of the individual business process costs quantiﬁed through the German and U.S. installer surveys. This residual term includes such items as property-related expenses (rent, utilities, etc.), inventory-related costs, additional insurances and fees, and general administrative costs. Our estimate of $1.61/W for ‘overhead, proﬁt and residual sow costs’ is generally consistent with the ﬁndings of CPF (2012). Research by Woodlawn Associates (2012) suggests that proﬁt margins for many U.S. installers are low or non-existent, implying that the diﬀerences shown for the ‘overhead, proﬁt, and other residual sow costs’ category is not the result of much higher proﬁt margins in the U.S.”
Longer Project Development Times
Aside from the longer installation period noted above, longer overall project development is also a reason for higher solar system costs in the U.S.
German installations go up much faster, but they’re actually larger.
Based on this, LBNL projects that there’s a 15¢/watt difference due to Germany’s larger systems.
The U.S. and Germany use Chinese solar modules (which are cheaper) to a similar degree, so that is not considered one of the reasons for the differences in price.
So, here’s a summary of LBNL’s findings (from LBNL’s Germany surveys and from secondary data):
“Possible Market Drivers for Soft Cost Differential”
Getting back to the root of the matter. What are the market drivers that result in the cost differences above? Here’s what LBNL concludes are possibilities:
So, lastly, some of the policy implications of the above are as follows:
Of course, a lot more research in this arena needs to be conducted. LBNL’s study is just the beginning. But it certainly opens up a lot of windows and alot of opportunity for improvement.
To see LBNL’s full report (which includes the images above and many more, as well as an extensive bibliography), go to: “Why Are Residential PV Prices in Germany So Much Lower Than in the United States?” [PDF].
Why German Solar Is So Much Cheaper Than U.S. Solar — Updated Study was originally published on: CleanTechnica. To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 30,000 others and subscribe to our free RSS feed, follow us on Facebook or Twitter, or just visit our homepage.
Posted: 17 Feb 2013 10:38 AM PST
The Tesla vs The New York Times battle has been hashed over all week, and the consensus in many quarters is that electric vehicles are ready for prime time, but Times reporter John Broder is, to put it kindly, not ready for electric vehicles. Lost in the sauce is the only real obstacle to getting more people behind the wheel of an EV, and that is affordability. Sooo… who’s doing what about that? Well don’t look now but the Obama Administration is doing something precisely about that with $20 million in new funding to develop affordable EV batteries.
Tesla vs New York Times vs Affordability
As Times reporter John Broder aptly demonstrated, the Tesla Model S is a brilliantly designed car, but no amount of cutting edge engineering can make up for a driver’s lack of common sense (obviously the same goes for gasoline powered cars, too).
For EVs, the problem isn’t within the battery range itself, it’s the expense involved in engineering high-range batteries. Unlike conventional cars, for which the gas tank is a negligible factor in the selling price, the battery pack is a key feature of an EV. Its size, weight, and configuration make all the difference between affordability and not.
That’s the challenge addressed by the Obama Administration’s latest project, the $20 million Robust Affordable Next Generation EV Storage Project (Range).
The EV Storage Project will be administered by the Energy Department’s cutting-edge research arm ARPA-E, which has just released a notice of the funding opportunity, though it does note that the $20 million is subject to the “availability of appropriated funds.”
The end goal is to come up with cutting-edge solutions that will triple the range of a typical EV from around 80 miles to 240 miles per charge, while chopping costs by around one third. The end result will be an EV that costs under $30,000 and can go on long trips before recharging, pretty much what you’d expect from a conventional vehicle.
At this first stage of the project, ARPA-E is focusing on the battery itself. That means breaking out of the conventional lithium-ion box and trying new approaches like these:
“Aqueous or other low-cost inorganic electrolyte based systems and novel cell geometries are of particular interest, as are flow battery architectures employing liquid or slurry-based reactants that enable physical isolation of active materials.”
It also means developing a “robust” battery that can shoulder other tasks aside from making the vehicle move. That would help extend the vehicle’s range, since it would enable the elimination of redundant equipment and/or structural elements.
Other considerations include the use of little or no flammable or combustible substances, and the reduction or elimination of waste heat.
President Obama and EV Affordability
When President Obama used his State of the Union Address to promise executive action on climate change if certain members of Congress continue to throw up roadblocks, he wasn’t exactly leaping into unknown territory.
Despite pushback from the aforementioned members of Congress (okay, so Republican leadership), for the past four years, the Administration has pushed forward with clean technology initiatives to reduce carbon emissions, including a raft of projects aimed at bringing down the cost of EV tech.
With the goal of making EV ownership affordable and accessible to the mass market, the Administration has already marshaled scores of public and private EV stakeholders together, including many of the top employers in the U.S., such as utilities, tech companies (Google being a big one), major fleet owners (FedEx for example), and manufacturers of all kinds both within and without the automotive sector.
One key element is EV Everywhere, which like the SunShot solar initiative is designed to accelerate new technology and overcome structural obstacles. As part of that program the Administration has just recruited 13 major U.S. employers to serve as role models for workplace EV charging, with the goal of getting many others to follow their lead.
The Administration also launched a partnership with Google to develop a national online database for EV charging station locations, an online guide for communities to accelerate their EV readiness, and a major energy storage research center called JCESR (Joint Center for Energy Storage Research).
One Last Word about that Tesla vs New York Times Thing
Not for nothing, but there was a long period of time not too long ago during which the conservative pundit Rush Limbaugh made a cottage industry out of bashing GM’s Chevy Volt. That seems to have died down, partly squashed by an aggressive ad campaign by GM featuring happy Volt owners.
Now, along comes The New York Times with a Limbaugh-style whack at Tesla, but this time it seems that EV enthusiasts have taken the matter into their own hands. Rather than waiting around for Tesla Motors to come out with a new ad campaign, a convoy of Tesla owners set out to replicate Broder’s journey this weekend under similar weather conditions. You can catch up with them on Twitter, complete with photos.
Psst, Hey, New York Times, The Real Issue with EVs Is Not the Miles, It’s the Money was originally published on: CleanTechnica. To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 30,000 others and subscribe to our free RSS feed, follow us on Facebook or Twitter, or just visit our homepage.
Posted: 17 Feb 2013 12:10 AM PST
Small-Scale Wind Energy Systems (VIDEOS) was originally published on: CleanTechnica. To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 30,000 others and subscribe to our free RSS feed, follow us on Facebook or Twitter, or just visit our homepage.
|You are subscribed to email updates from CleanTechnica |
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
|Email delivery powered by Google|
|Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610|